Jump to content

Talk:Messier object

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLCMessier object is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 30, 2015Featured list candidateNot promoted
April 5, 2019Featured list candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured list candidate

Apparent Dimension missing after M34!

[edit]

Sizes are given for M1-M34 but not M34-M110!!!??? David Moore, Editor Astronomy Ireland magazine 2A00:23C8:A2FB:4601:4D78:8CFC:E9BB:AE3F (talk) 01:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shock! Horror! Amazement!
Clearly no one has yet to add them to the table. Feel free. Primefac (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just filled in the apparent dimension numbers based on objects' individual pages. So much fun! :) Assambrew (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date of M110 addition

[edit]

The article gives 1967 as the year for M110 being added to the messier catalog, but the Encyclopedia Britannicia gives the date 1966[1]. Icouldnotthinkofabettername (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Glyn Jones, Messier's Nebulae & Star Clusters, (1st edition 1968), p. 16, lists 110 as being added (by Glyn Jones) in 1966. -- Elphion (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bibliographic info: Kenneth Glyn Jones, Messier's Nebulae & Star Clusters, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 16, ISBN 0-521-37079-5. First edition published in 1968. -- Elphion (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common names added

[edit]

I just created redirects from common names of various Messier objects to their respective Wikipedia articles. The Wikipedia articles have also been updated to include those names. I have checked the common names on Google, and they all seem to be valid. Hypersolmeteor (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent Units for Angular Size

[edit]

Do people think it would make sense to put the angular size (Apparent dimensions) in consistent units so it is easily sortable. I think arcminutes would make the most sense. Jonathan Keohane (talk) 22:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]